The Indian Health Service (IHS), as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a pre- clearance consultation program to provide the general public and Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program helps to ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed. As required by section 3507(a)(1)(D) of the Act, the proposed information collection has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. The IHS received comments in response to the 60-day Federal Register notice (67 FR 50892) published on August 6, 2002. The public comments received in response to the notice and the agency responses are summarized and addressed below. Comment: One comment questioned the accuracy of the public burden estimate for this collection of information by indicating the burden estimate seemed to be too low. Agency response: The burden estimate was checked by having additional clinical staff review and complete the application formats. This consultation was conducted within the Department of Health and Human Services with the Federal Credentialing Program, and with several Department of Defense (DoD) hospital medical staff members. They confirmed the accuracy of the burden hour estimates for formats used in this information collection activity and the burden for the Application to Medical staff was increased accordingly. They made no specific recommendations to change any of the application formats or process. Comments: One comment suggested we consider the time burden spent by agency staff on this activity. Agency response: The time spent by agency staff to handle and process this data collection is not considered in the ``public'' burden estimate. However, the agency is examining methods to reduce the time it takes agency staff to process this required data. Comment: One comment suggested IHS centralize or regionalize the credentialing process and make it a web-based format. Agency response: Agency staff responsible for oversight of the medical staff credentials and privileges application process are currently collaborating with the Veterans Health Administration and DoD health program staff to make cost-appropriate advances and improvements in the credentials process and to automated appropriate portions of the credentials and privileges process. At present, automation of this process and use of a data repository like the Federal Credentialing Program or other complex relational databases is prohibitively expensive for the IHS. It is hoped that the collaboration will result in the automation and/or centralization/regionalization of some aspects of the agency's credentialing process and thereby reduce the public burden to provide the data and the agency staff time needed to process the data. Comment: One comment suggested IHS implement a nationwide corporate credentialing service with staff trained in the credentialing process. Agency response: The collaboration discussed above will address this suggestion. Comment: One comment suggested the credentialing process include a ``criminal background check''. Agency response: The criminal background check is not a part of the IHS credentialing process. However, Public Law 101-630, the Indian Child Protection and Family Violence Protection Act, requires that all IHS employees, including the medical staff, with potential direct or unobserved contact with kids be checked for any history of criminal acts against children. In addition, the Division of Commissioned Personnel, United States Public Health Service, conducts a criminal background check as part of its Childcare National Agency Check with Written Inquiries (CNACI) system on all new appointees. The purpose of this notice is to allow an additional 30 days for public comment to be submitted directly to OMB.
- Agencies
- Health and Human Services Department Indian Health Service
- Document Number
- 02-31251
- Published in
- United States of America