Authors
PIERRI Erika, EGLE Lukas, FOSTER Gillian, ANTONOPOULOS Ioannis, ALBIZZATI Paola Federica, TONINI Davide, CRISTOBAL GARCIA Jorge, MARSCHINSKI Robert, GAUDILLAT Pierre
Related Organizations
- Other identifiers
- EUR 32031,OP KJ-NA-32-031-EN-N (online)
- Pages
- 59
- Published in
- Belgium
- Rights Holder
- https://ec.europa.eu/info/legal-notice_en#copyright-notice
Table of Contents
- Abstract 5
- Acknowledgements 6
- Executive summary 7
- 1 Introduction 9
- 1.1 Policy context and background 9
- 1.2 Rationale and objective of the study 10
- 1.3 Scope 11
- 1.3.1 Dimensions of quality management covered 11
- 1.3.2 Waste management phases and target authorities 11
- 1.3.3 Waste fractions 11
- 2 Overview of current practices for data collection, reporting and monitoring 13
- 2.1 Transmission of statistics 13
- 2.2 Reporting obligations 13
- 2.3 Eurostat Waste Database 15
- 2.4 National Electronic Registries for Waste 16
- 2.5 Standards and methodologies for waste composition analysis 22
- 2.6 Common performance indicators for waste management 24
- 2.6.1 Eurostat waste-related indicators 24
- 2.6.2 Indicators proposed in the JRC best environmental practice 25
- 2.6.3 KPIs for economic instruments in municipal waste management 26
- 2.6.4 Best practices: impurity rates in the separately collected waste 27
- 3 Operational framework for a harmonised quality management system 29
- 3.1 Data collection and reporting 29
- 3.1.1 Electronic Registries for Waste 29
- 3.1.2 Reporting obligations 29
- 3.2 Proposal for a harmonised methodology for waste composition analysis 30
- 3.2.1 Frequency of waste composition analysis 30
- 3.2.2 Sampling plan at national level 31
- 3.2.3 Classification of waste fractions 32
- 3.3 Monitoring 36
- 3.3.1 Proposed KPIs 36
- 4 Potential financial costs, benefits, and socio-economic impacts 39
- 4.1 Potential financial costs 39
- 4.1.1 Cost of establishing and managing a national Electronic Registry for Waste 39
- 4.1.2 Cost of conducting waste composition analyses 39
- 4.1.3 Cost of implementing a monitoring system with specific KPIs 40
- 4.2 Potential benefits 40
- 4.3 Potential socio-economic impacts 41
- 5 Conclusions and recommendations 42
- References 43
- List of abbreviations 49
- List of figures 49
- List of tables 50
- Annexes 51
- Annex 1. List of Waste 51
- Annex 2. A methodology to calculate generated municipal waste from collected amounts 53